Menu Close

2 Part Thought ->Base size&Tame Count

Please do not suggest ideas that are already there. Vote on them instead! That way we can quickly see what suggestions are in highest demand to be answered.

Thank you for your input and helping us to improve DomiNATION!

3 votes

2 Part Thought ->Base size&Tame Count

Under current rules in regards to Base size and tame counts. A full pat member could have a total of 30 bases and a total dino count of 10,000 if they chose to play all maps and mass store dinos. Dino population has always been a topic as many dinos are hoarded,unused, and many never see daylight after birth. Believe dino counts could be lowered (after consideration of how to go about) Base sizing. I do agree Genesis could be giving a increase of sizing. But since playing on Gen. and seeing what can be done with smaller sizes. I believe now that 200x200x36 is ludicrous as well as other pat sizes. Also belive public sizes could be decreased to half in perimeter(50×50). Oraking 50×50 the same on public maps (limiting 1 base) and reducing pat base limits *I know this may be unpopular
Hack2Override shared this idea

3 Comments

  1. Kolobok

    I’d maybe agree to limiting to 1 base plus small taming trap or similar. But if you start killing breeding (where you need space and tame limit) and creative building, might as well call this a pvp cluster.. What else would be left to do?

  2. LostAmI

    Limiting base sizes would cause a lot of players to totally rebuild.

    However I feel that having multiple max size bases is an issue.
    Perhaps if we we make it “One base of max 200x200x36 or two bases of max 100x100x 36” I think that would be better.

    However it should be noted that 200x200x36 bases are almost required for super breeders (large dinos specifically)

    I myself utilize a large courtyard.
    The problem is we have people who build two large bases per map but utilized maybe 2 of them.

    Making rule changes to target that specific problem I think is more reasonable then to use a broader rule change that could effect more respectful players who utilize one large base to do 90% of their work and try and keep their number large bases under control.

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

  1. Kolobok

    I’d maybe agree to limiting to 1 base plus small taming trap or similar. But if you start killing breeding (where you need space and tame limit) and creative building, might as well call this a pvp cluster.. What else would be left to do?

  2. LostAmI

    Limiting base sizes would cause a lot of players to totally rebuild.

    However I feel that having multiple max size bases is an issue.
    Perhaps if we we make it “One base of max 200x200x36 or two bases of max 100x100x 36” I think that would be better.

    However it should be noted that 200x200x36 bases are almost required for super breeders (large dinos specifically)

    I myself utilize a large courtyard.
    The problem is we have people who build two large bases per map but utilized maybe 2 of them.

    Making rule changes to target that specific problem I think is more reasonable then to use a broader rule change that could effect more respectful players who utilize one large base to do 90% of their work and try and keep their number large bases under control.

Comments are closed.